Official stdx

[Dicebot]

On Friday, 4 October 2013 at 10:30:56 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
> There is an alternative risk -- that people will be more 
> inclined to just throw stuff over the wall into stdx because, 
> hey, it's an experimental/testing area, the whole idea is for 
> people to try out imperfect code and work out what's wrong with 
> it ...

And to be 100% clear - I meant this dub category to be moderated 
and only filled after formal review process. We simply need some 
place for modules which got conceptually approved but can't yet 
meet API stability and/or implementation quality required for 
inclusion into Phobos as-is.