std.d.lexer : voting thread

[simendsjo]

On Monday, 7 October 2013 at 13:29:30 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> On Sunday, 6 October 2013 at 18:54:55 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Any formal review may potentially result in short voting after 
>> if no critical issues are found so I don't think it makes 
>> sense in making any additional announcements. There are no 
>> special points of attention - if review was declared and you 
>> want to make some input, it should be done right there.
>
> Yes, but people are lazy. I don't talk about all of us, but 
> most of people are lazy.
> Somebody of us will vote because it's interesting, but will not 
> read/write review tread because it requests a time.
> So, additional announce of upcoming voting can help: "Guys, if 
> you want to vote, it's time to read documentation and write 
> your really cool idea before voting".

This is the reason I've not cast any votes for standard modules - 
I haven't had the time, or don't have the competence, to cast a 
valid vote. It would be like voting for a political party without 
knowing where all parties stands in all cases.