The "no gc" crowd

[Sean Kelly]

On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 09:56:10 UTC, Leandro Lucarella 
wrote:
>
> This is not really what's stopping the porting, is a problem, 
> but an independent one. My idea was to port the GC as it is in 
> Tango, and then see how to overcome its limitations.

I tried this a while back, but the GC in Druntime has changed a 
bunch since it diverged from Tango, and some or all of those 
changed need to be applied to your concurrent collector before it 
can be used.  Like you, I ended up not having the time for this.  
I think you'd need to do a diff of the current GC code vs. the 
code as it was originally checked into SVN on DSource.