Had another 48hr game jam this weekend...

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 06:45:48 +0200
"Kapps" <opantm2+spam at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sunday, 1 September 2013 at 02:05:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > One more thing:
> > I'll just pick one language complaint from the weekend.
> > It is how quickly classes became disorganised and difficult to 
> > navigate
> > (like Java and C#).
> > We all wanted to ability to define class member functions 
> > outside the class
> > definition:
> >   class MyClass
> >   {
> >     void method();
> >   }
> >
> >   void MyClass.method()
> >   {
> >     //...
> >   }
> >
> > It definitely cost us time simply trying to understand the 
> > class layout
> > visually (ie, when IDE support is barely available).
> > You don't need to see the function bodies in the class 
> > definition, you want
> > to quickly see what a class has and does.
> 
> This isn't something I've found to be an issue personally, but I 
> suppose it's a matter of what you're used to. Since I'm used to 
> C#, I haven't had problems with this. I've always felt that this 
> was the IDE's job, personally. That being said, perhaps .di files 
> could help with this?

I see it as the job of doc generators.