new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates

[dennis luehring]

Am 08.09.2013 08:46, schrieb Iain Buclaw:
>> im talking about "Parameter names need not match."
>> so it will become hard to find the same overload of a method if someone else
>> writes int a, int b in declaration and int pa, int pb in implementation -
>> and the only benefit is beeing compatible with c/c++ - that will introduce
>> another point in all D-coding-style guides around the world not to rename
>> parameter in implementation
>
> I was talking about "Parameter names need not match" too... I disagree
> that mismatched parameter names makes things hard to find, and by way
> of example, I just search for the function.  I never say "right, I
> need to find this implementation" and grep for the parameter list in
> the declaration...

i work as a independed refactorig/bug hunter developer on big team (30+ 
developers) big projects (1Mio LOC+) - i need to do that most of the 
time - i like D for beeing better refactorable/readable in the long run 
(years) of projects

different people - different needs