new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates

[Peter Williams]

On 08/09/13 16:47, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 9/7/2013 11:08 PM, Peter Williams wrote:
>> In summary, you've gotten rid of the need for this type of duplication
>> so why
>> would you introduce it?
>
> I believe that is covered in the "Rationale" section of the dip.

Couldn't see a rational answer to my question in the rationale.

Looked more like a "I want to do this and I think that we should change 
the language syntax to allow it" statement to me.  It doesn't really add 
functionality just makes what's there more complex.

Peter