dub: should we make it the de jure package manager for D?

Sönke Ludwig sludwig at outerproduct.org
Tue Sep 10 23:28:10 PDT 2013


Am 11.09.2013 00:06, schrieb luminousone:
> Projects that haven't had an update for an excessive amount of
> time should likely be hidden but still available except in cases
> where it is known to be unchanged without need for updates(such
> as most wrappers).

Agreed. Maybe some other knowledge, such as how many other (active) 
packages depend on it, or how often it is still downloaded, can help to 
get a robust automatic measure.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list