std.d.lexer: pre-voting review / discussion

Brian Schott briancschott at gmail.com
Tue Sep 17 13:14:35 PDT 2013


On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 16:48:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 16:34:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 15:31:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> Discussion has slowed down and thread is fading away.
>>>
>>> I personally have not noticed any crucial objections (ones 
>>> that can't be figured out during normal pull request review 
>>> process). Brian, what is your state on this? Is there 
>>> something you want to add/change before the voting gets 
>>> initiated?
>>
>> I had some comments that nobody addressed. Mostly about firing 
>> several instances of the lexer with the same identifier pool.
>
> Well, I suppose only Brian can address it :) I am only checking 
> if there are no commonly repeated objections that are likely to 
> ruin the voting. There are plenty of comments of course and I 
> would recommend Brian to at least make some statement about 
> those before voting but that is his call.
>
> There is a possibility to mention one issue as a blocker when 
> voting though, that will be taken into consideration when 
> counting actual votes.

I've been busy with things that aren't D-related recently, but I 
should have time the rest of this week to address the lexer.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list