Voting: std.logger

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/19/14, 2:44 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 02:26:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> This is very promising! Has the versioning issue been solved? I.e. we
>> want the user code to choose the static logging level, not distribute
>> five versions of Phobos.
>
> There is now a template function with version statements inside that
> returns a bool that is used in an static if inside the templates that
> implement the log calls with explicit LogLevel. As the version
> statements get evaluated at CT of the log call from the user code only
> one version of Phobos is required. And you can disable all five LogLevel
> individual.

This is great, thanks. Not only this will be a good thing for 
std.logger, but it will set a precedent for new similar libraries 
without an explosion in distributions.

We need some unittests to ensure that kind of stuff I guess.


Andrei