RFC: std.json sucessor

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/23/2014 12:00 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 8/23/2014 10:46 AM, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> I feel that non-UTF encodings should be handled by adapter algorithms,
>> not embedded into the JSON lexer, so yes, I'd drop that.
>
> For performance purposes, determining encoding during lexing is useful.

I'm not convinced that using an adapter algorithm won't be just as fast.