Idea #1 on integrating RC with GC

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad" <ola.fosheim.grostad+dlang at gmail.com>]

On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 at 09:55:09 UTC, Francesco Cattoglio 
wrote:
> Ok, I'm a bit fed up by your attitude so I'll express a 
> personal opinion now: it seems to me that when people express 
> any kind of judgment, it's ad hominem against you.

You either respond to assertions about technology or ignore it. 
The moment you address the person and not the argument you are 
going in the wrong direction.

Making an analysis of project as an artifact is not "ad hominem", 
even if the creator of the artifact strongly disagrees with the 
analysis. If the creator dislike the analysis, ignore it. If the 
creator thinks it is interesting, respond to it.

It is neither friendly or unfriendly.
It is usually not necessary, because most projects are pretty 
clear on where they are heading.
I the case of D, it is not clear.

It is not clear if there is enough momentum in the D community to 
sustain a real-time D either.

These "debates" make the fog less thick so one can see possible 
directions for D. Which is a combination of management and the 
willingness of the D community to "be vocal about real time 
issues". Being complacent and meek is not going to change the 
direction of D.