Better C++?

[H. S. Teoh]

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 07:28:33PM +0000, Frustrated wrote:
> Is that not just C+++? When the gc and allocation gets fixed
> we'll end up with C++++?
> 
> Then don't we have D = C^n for some n? Does this hold for
> negative numbers? Complex numbers?

I have enough trouble imagining C^n for irrational n, nevermind negative
numbers or complex numbers!


T

-- 
Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals could believe them. -- George Orwell