On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:28:33 -0500, Frustrated <c1514843 at drdrb.com> wrote: > Is that not just C+++? When the gc and allocation gets fixed > we'll end up with C++++? No, C+++ isn't valid, and I don't know about C++++, but I'm suspecting no. The next generation would be C+=2 :P -Steve