critique of vibe.d

[Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/9/2014 10:49 AM, Chris wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 01:35:49 UTC, Puming wrote:
>
>> That commenter is probably a web developer that wants all batteries
>> included.
>
> Yep. He mistook vibe.d for a complete web development framework, I
> suppose. It's quite common that people are put off because they expect
> too much or do not understand what the technology is really about. While
> we may not win this particular user back, it is important to clarify
> where s/he was mistaken, so that myths based on false assumptions are
> not propagated.
>

Can't it be used as a complete web framework? I mean, assuming you're 
happy with the built-in templating and DB options? Or is everyone using 
"web framework" here to really mean "CMS"?