GCs in the news

Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jul 20 05:07:46 PDT 2014

On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 11:44:56 UTC, Mike wrote:
> Being able to specify an alternate memory manager at 
> compile-time, link-time and/or runtime would be most 
> advantageous, and probably put an end to the GC-phobia.

AFAIK, GC is not directly referenced in druntime, so you already 
should be able to link with different GC implementation. If you 
provide all symbols requested by the code, the linker won't link 
default GC module.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list