WAT: opCmp and opEquals woes

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/25/2014 5:10 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 25/07/14 11:37, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> We went through the likely code breakage from this in this thread, and
>> it's hard to see any non-broken code breaking. It will also fix
>> regression https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179 and stop that
>> breakage.
>
> So opEquals will not be required to be defined if opCmp is defined if it's used
> as an AA key?

Right.