Changing the behavior of the comma operator

[bearophile]

ixid:

> Does this also mean a proper tuple syntax on a par with Go's is 
> going to wait for five years? That seems too long for what 
> should be a major feature and would suggest it should be done 
> with something other than the comma operator.

I think commas should not be used in ways that have a different 
semantics in C. So I think D tuples should have a syntax that 
uses comma operator like that.

In the precedent thread Andrei has shown a ugly syntax to manage 
tuples.

Bye,
bearophile