Parallel execution of unittests

Xavier Bigand via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu May 1 10:04:51 PDT 2014


Le 01/05/2014 16:01, Atila Neves a écrit :
> On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 11:44:12 UTC, w0rp wrote:
>> On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 11:05:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>> On 2014-04-30 23:35, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agreed. I think we should look into parallelizing all unittests. --
>>>> Andrei
>>>
>>> I recommend running the tests in random order as well.
>>
>> This is a bad idea. Tests could fail only some of the time. Even if
>> bugs are missed, I would prefer it if tests did exactly the same thing
>> every time.
>
> They _should_ do exactly the same thing every time. Which is why running
> in threads or at random is a great way to enforce that.
>
> Atila
+1


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list