DIP(?) Warning to facilitate porting to other archs

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 2 May 2014 at 21:40:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> True, that is a problem. But if folks really want the warnings, 
> they can go to the extra effort.

Why are we making people go to extra effort to get lint-like 
functionality if we want it to be something that everyone uses? 
Whether a linter is a separate logical entity within the compiler 
or a library that can be hooked into, it should be on by default.