radical ideas about GC and ARC : need to be time driven?

[Manu via Digitalmars-d]

On 11 May 2014 05:39, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:16:54PM +0200, Xavier Bigand via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>  - Same question if D migrate to ARC?
>
> I highly doubt D will migrate to ARC. ARC will probably become
> *possible*, but some language features fundamentally rely on the GC, and
> I can't see how that will ever be changed.

Which ones are incompatible with ARC?