Why is `scope` planned for deprecation?

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"Manu via Digitalmars-d"  wrote in message 
news:mailman.1926.1415879071.9932.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...

> Incidentally, I've recently started a new C++ job, first C++ I've
> written in some years... (after ~18 years, 12 professionally,
> full-time C/C++)
> After having adapted to D and distancing from C++, trying to go back
> is like some form of inhuman torture!
> I really don't remember it being as bad as it is... the time away has
> given me new perspective on how terrible C++ is, and I can say with
> confidence, there is NOTHING C++ could do to make itself a 'better
> option' at this point.
> Judged on common ground, there is no competition. It's only 'the devil
> you know' case that I think can possibly make an argument for C++.

I know, it's easy to forget how bad C++ is to work with.  The new versions 
have fixed some of the pain points, but only some.