std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Oct 27 15:19:51 PDT 2014


On 10/27/2014 01:36 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
> Well, as far as I can see his argument was based on old code that has
> long been rewritten and he hasn't answered since I pointed that out.

How do come to that insight?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list