toString refactor in druntime

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/27/2014 12:42 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> I'm planning on doing a pull request for druntime which rewrites every toString
> function within druntime to use the new sink signature. That way druntime would
> cause a lot less allocations which end up beeing garbage right away. Are there
> any objections against doing so? Any reasons why such a pull request would not
> get accepted?

Why a sink version instead of an Output Range?