toString refactor in druntime

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 31 October 2014 at 19:04:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 12:42 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
>> I'm planning on doing a pull request for druntime which 
>> rewrites every toString
>> function within druntime to use the new sink signature. That 
>> way druntime would
>> cause a lot less allocations which end up beeing garbage right 
>> away. Are there
>> any objections against doing so? Any reasons why such a pull 
>> request would not
>> get accepted?
>
> Why a sink version instead of an Output Range?

I guess because it's for druntime, and we don't want to pull in 
std.range?