Deprecations: Any reason left for warning stage?

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"David Nadlinger"  wrote in message 
news:hqjjujxwydtzpgfcnqax at forum.dlang.org...

> As far as I can see having deprecation messages as Warnings first actually 
> leads to *more* build breakage (as many more people are building with -w 
> than with -de) and less time for adapting code before it is made an error 
> (because -w/-wi is not the default).

But that's a good thing - the people who get their code broken are the 
people who are asking for it with '-w'.