Wanted: Review manager for std.data.json

[Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 09:58:31 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>
> That's what we have the review thread for. The library is now 
> in a state that everyone can easily try out. If it were a 
> Phobos PR, that would be much more difficult (or I'd have to 
> maintain two versions in parallel).

from experience: Hardly anybody reads previous posts. comments on 
the source make it easier for you to get useful criticism and 
filter all the noise.

> I still have to look into running a proper benchmark. Initial 
> numbers that I just collected have not been as good as expected 
> - I'll have to take a closer look at the compiler output.

I thought more performance was one of the major reason for the 
json replacement. We need graphs!