dmd codegen improvements

H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Aug 29 08:42:44 PDT 2015


On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 01:06:56PM +0000, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 29 August 2015 at 12:59:59 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> >I'm happy with the codegen the way it is, it is good enough for me,
> >but let's not make mountains out of hills.
> 
> But the fact is that many people are not. Even the core language team,
> who doesn't want their compiler to get 30% slower on the next release.
[...]

The good thing about switching to DDMD the next release is that
(finally) we are forced to address codegen issues. I hope this will
finally get Walter going on codegen improvements, which I'm quite sure
he's well capable of, but just hasn't gotten around to it until now.

Here's to hoping https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14943 will be
fixed by next release...


T

-- 
"No, John.  I want formats that are actually useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that address all questions by piling on ridiculous internal links in forms which are hideously over-complex." -- Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list