Some feedback on the website.

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:00:19PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 12:21 AM, ZombineDev wrote:
> >Well DDoc may have it's disadvantages, but I'm certain that the
> >documentation would have been far worse if it wasn't for it.
> 
> No need to speculate :-) Before Ddoc, the Phobos documentation was
> horrific, probably the worst I'd ever seen. It was so bad it was
> unusual for there to be any correct documentation for a particular
> function, or even anything at all.
> 
> Ddoc utterly transformed that, almost overnight. It's hard to
> underestimate the positive impact Ddoc has had on D documentation.

I don't think anybody is questioning the value of ddoc as a
*documentation generator*. The issue here is whether it has the same
value as a *website programming language*. Very different things.


T

-- 
"640K ought to be enough" -- Bill G. (allegedly), 1984. "The Internet is not a primary goal for PC usage" -- Bill G., 1995. "Linux has no impact on Microsoft's strategy" -- Bill G., 1999.