Another idiom I wish were gone from phobos/druntime

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/5/2015 12:22 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> No. It's just a frustratingly common mistake - like saying "for all
> intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes."

What? I thought it was "for all infants and porpoises"!