Const-correctness and uniqueness. Again.

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 11 February 2015 at 13:54:12 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Monday, 9 February 2015 at 23:40:31 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> Someone is starting to see where I'm getting at when I'm 
>> pushing for owned...
>
> I don't think this specific case is a good justification for 
> your proposal - it is simple enough to accept a library based 
> solution. We need more accumulated anecdotal evidence.

We do have. That is simply one more. On the top of my head:
  - Plug hole in the type system (implicit sharing).
  - Use the guarantee the type system is supposed to provide to 
get a better GC.
  - Construction of immutable objects.
  - make @nogc actually useful for something else than trivias 
(throw, defers usage of GC to the caller).
  - make std.concurency and std.parallelism safe end to end.
  - Be able to lock tree of objects.
  - Generating less garbage overall.
  - ...