Improving ddoc

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d]

On 02/01/15 22:03, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> The thing is, ( ) naturally pair in code, and naturally paired ( ) are not an
> issue in Ddoc. One never sees [..) in code (maybe Mathematica supports it).

Er, I believe I posted an example of just that :-)

I'm entirely open to the possibility of reworking the 'uniform' function so that 
its bounds are indicated in a different way, but it _is_ something that 
currently occurs in D code (albeit not frequently).

> Grep the Phobos sources, the only stray paren issue in it is the use of [..) in
> a few places in the documentation. I know it's irritating for you, but it simply
> is not prevalent.

I can live with you not addressing my irritation :-)  But since we're discussing 
how to improve Ddoc, I thought it best to make sure that my issues with it were 
well described and understood.