4x4

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 1/8/15 9:16 AM, Kiith-Sa wrote:
>
> This is a problem with naming, not with DDox. It would look bad
> regardless of generator, or regardless of documentation at all. You
> could make it look slightly less bad, but you might end up hurting other
> documentation. (I'm not implying  it should be renamed (bad reason for
> breaking compatibility), but I see no point in changing doc generation
> just because of some bad naming.)

Sigh. No matter how I look at it, the same name repeated FOUR times only 
evokes Java's factory factory etc. -- Andrei