version: multiple conditions

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 11:09:23 +0000, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> Well, you're entitled to your opinion, and you're definitely free to
> avoid C++ libraries if that what you want, but there are plenty of D
> users who want good C++ interop (and for some projects, pretty much
> require it - especially the corporate folks), so there's actually a
> fairly high demand for it. And part of why the C++ interop that we have
> is as good as it is now is because it was needed to port the compiler's
> frontend to D and have it still work with the backends of the three main
> compilers.
> So, it's there because it serves a very practical purpose.

and still not working reliably, partly due to absence of standardized 
mangling schemes and ABI in C++. this is a neverending chase.


> So, use it or don't, but don't expect everyone to agree with you that
> interoperability with C++ is useless.

but i can try! ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150702/7af49f8b/attachment.sig>