Daily downloads in decline

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:48:01 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
> at the risk of sounding like a broken record, if ldc/gdc not 
> being 2.067 stops a DDMD release due to dmd's generated code 
> being too slow, maybe it's time to phase dmd out ;)

Once SDC is at a point where it can compile most of or all D code 
that DMD compiles, it would be a good replacement.