Daily downloads in decline

weaselcat via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 9 21:57:17 PDT 2015


On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 02:56:26 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 02:25:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 6/9/2015 6:25 PM, weaselcat wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:43 UTC, Walter Bright 
>>> wrote:
>>>> We wouldn't have had a Win64 version of D without DMD.
>>>
>>> There's a 64 bit version of LDC-MSVC right on LDC's github 
>>> page, does it not work?
>>
>> Recently it did not exist, but Win64 had become critical to 
>> D's future.
>
> Just out of curiosity, if ldc or gdc was able to bring their 
> compile times down, would you ever consider dropping support 
> for dmd?

ldc already compiles release builds faster than dmd and is well 
within 10-20% of dmd on debug builds.

In my repeated tests, anyways.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list