DIP80: phobos additions

[Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 01:55:15 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
> From the outset, my thought was to strictly define the set of 
> (eight or so?) symbols for this.  If memory serves, it was 
> right around the time Walter's rejected wholesale user-defined 
> operators because of exactly the problem you mention. 
> (Compounded by Unicode-- what the hell is "2 🐵 8" supposed to 
> be!?)  I strongly suspect you don't need many simultaneous 
> extra operators on a type to cover most cases.
>
> -Wyatt

What would the new order of operations be for these new operators?