std.(experimental.)logger voting manager wanted

[Mike via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 10:07:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote:

> The tricky part about being review manager is exactly that 
> there are no strict rules. In the end it is all about ensuring 
> Phobos quality and stability and sometimes arbitrary calls had 
> to be made.

Well, I'll be forthcoming and say that I use Phobos very little, 
and have little stake in this.  I'm just a little frustrated with 
things not being followed through on and I want to do something 
about it.  I won't be able to vouch for the quality of the 
submission, but I can collect the data, facilitate the process, 
document it, and perform the legwork.

I also don't think two reviews/votes should take place at a time 
thinning out resources or causing reviewers to feel rushed.  I 
suggest the vote for std.logger take place after the 
review/voting of std.allocator.

Mike