std.(experimental.)logger voting manager wanted

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/12/15 5:58 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
> std.(experimental.)logger has been in phobos for one release. The idea
> was to mature stuff in experimental for one release and then have a vote
> on inclusion into phobos as std.logger.
>
> I would like to see this vote happen before 2.068.
> Unfortunately, Dicebot is not longer the review manager.
>
> Who wants to count yes/no/(my logger is better) votes in a forum thread?

I'd say we hold off on this until we finalize reference counting. Right 
now std.logger requires GC. -- Andrei