stdx.data.json needs a layer on top

[Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d]

On 24/06/2015 12:17 a.m., Laeeth Isharc wrote:
> It's great, but it's not quite a replacement for std.json, as I see it.
>
> The stream parser is fast, and it's valuable to be able to access it at
> a low level.
>
> However, it was consciously designed to be low-level, and for something
> else to go on top.
>
> As I understand it, there is a gap between what you can currently do
> with std.json (and indeed vibed json) and what you can do with
> stdx.data.json.  And the capability falls short of what can be done in
> other standard libraries such as the ones for python.
>
> So since we are going for a nuclear-power station included approach,
> does that not mean that we need to specify what this layer should do,
> and somebody should start to work on it?

Please come onto https://www.livecoding.tv/alphaglosined/ and hang out 
for half an hour. I want to show you something related.