std.path.setExt

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 14:01:32 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:51:08 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:45:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Proposed new name: withExtension
>
> I feel this fails the litmus you established before: "These 
> functions have the same functionality, but one of them is 
> eager, and the other is lazy. Can you guess which is which?"
>
> I don't think I'd interpret these two names as having the same 
> functionality in the first place.  I'd probably learn their 
> equivalence completely by accident and only remember it by rote.

Interesting. But once you know that, it's easy to tell which is 
which, no?