std.experimental.testing PR review

[Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 17:37:13 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 16:44:49 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>> [...]
>
> And disagreement about how idiomatic such style preferences 
> should be is exactly the reason why I will vote "no".
>
> Look at it this way : if this proposal will never get to 
> Phobos, I won't lose anything. It does not have any really 
> important utility I need in standard library. Main thing about 
> this proposal is making certain testing style standard - and 
> thus there is no practical reason to accept any compromises.

I understand your point. _My_ point is that nobody has to use 
UFCS if they don't want to. In fact, plain asserts could be used 
too.

Atila