A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project

[weaselcat via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 10:34:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Ola Fosheim Grøstad:
>
>> Yes, but what is a "strict mode". I agree with most of what is 
>> said about D and Go in the top post, but is there a market for 
>> yet another high level language that isn't high level enough?
>
> "Strict mode" is a D2 with immutable+ at safe+pure by default, 
> something like a "var" keyword to denote mutable values, no 
> comma operator, static full tracking of memory ownership, less 
> implicit casts (because now we have the safe int(x) sytnax), 
> and few other small changes that make the language less bug 
> prone and more strict.
>
> And I'd still like built-in tuple syntax in D.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

That actually sounds quite nice, but I wonder if this is just 
hopeful wishing or something D would actively move towards.