A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project
weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 13 03:43:10 PDT 2015
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 10:34:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Ola Fosheim Grøstad:
>> Yes, but what is a "strict mode". I agree with most of what is
>> said about D and Go in the top post, but is there a market for
>> yet another high level language that isn't high level enough?
> "Strict mode" is a D2 with immutable+ at safe+pure by default,
> something like a "var" keyword to denote mutable values, no
> comma operator, static full tracking of memory ownership, less
> implicit casts (because now we have the safe int(x) sytnax),
> and few other small changes that make the language less bug
> prone and more strict.
> And I'd still like built-in tuple syntax in D.
That actually sounds quite nice, but I wonder if this is just
hopeful wishing or something D would actively move towards.
More information about the Digitalmars-d