A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 13 07:55:22 PDT 2015

On 3/13/15 6:45 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> The removal of shared memory multi-threading in favour of using
> processes and channels should never be underestimated as a Really Good
> Thing™ that other native code languages (*) have failed to do anything
> about. Thus Go wins, others lose.

That's a marketing success as well. Go didn't "remove" shared memory 
multi-threading, it just unrecommends it. That's quite unremarkable from 
a programming language design standpoint, but as discussed that's not 
always crucial for success. -- Andrei

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list