A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project

Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Mar 14 02:02:52 PDT 2015

On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 07:55 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
> On 3/13/15 6:45 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > The removal of shared memory multi-threading in favour of using
> > processes and channels should never be underestimated as a Really Good
> > Thing™ that other native code languages (*) have failed to do anything
> > about. Thus Go wins, others lose.
> That's a marketing success as well. Go didn't "remove" shared memory 
> multi-threading, it just unrecommends it. That's quite unremarkable from 
> a programming language design standpoint, but as discussed that's not 
> always crucial for success. -- Andrei

I think you need to show a bit of Go code that uses threads to be able
to back up that claim.

Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150314/a98c8d9b/attachment.sig>

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list