Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections

deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Mar 19 15:27:33 PDT 2015

On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 22:05:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/19/2015 2:40 AM, deadalnix wrote:
>> And I'm sorry, but if most function require DDoc, your code 
>> probably sucks quite
>> badly and some renaming should be considered.
> I've never seen any code that self-documented "why".

Indeed, that is why comment are useful. If all your method
require a why, you probably should consider refactoring instead
of adding comments all over the place.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list