Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Mar 23 12:04:29 PDT 2015
On 3/18/15 2:48 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every day.
> Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particularly difficult.
If the idea is to force it on all users, I'm with deadalnix 100%.
But what if -w makes ddoc do this, so you have a choice? Or some other
I would also find handy a switch to simply display publicly undocumented
functions in the documentation. I recently went through and documented
all core.stdc items with empty docs so they would just show up. Was
actually quite monotonous.
More information about the Digitalmars-d