Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Mar 29 21:44:07 PDT 2015
On 30/03/2015 5:39 p.m., bitwise wrote:
>> But first we need to finish off what support we damn well have in
>> m_offTi for TypeInfo_Class currently is not being generated.
>> We also need some form of RTInfo for modules. Not just for symbols.
>> This alone will open up quite a few doors!
> In the "time for std.reflection" convo, it seemed like Andre was talking
> about a library solution, and not something compiler generated.. has
> that idea since been thrown out?
This definitely should be a library solution. But it seems silly, to not
use code in druntime. Either that, or if it is like m_offTi, remove it.
After all, it was never implemented.
> Has there been other conversations on this that I missed?
More information about the Digitalmars-d