Named unittests

Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at
Tue Mar 31 16:22:52 PDT 2015

On 03/31/2015 04:45 PM, Idan Arye wrote:
> But unittests already have names(, so
> the only required change is to allow the user to specify that name. This
> should be much simpler than adding entirely new fields.

That's the line number, which can't be used as the OP pointed out.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list