I hate new DUB config format

Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Nov 26 23:15:52 PST 2015


On 2015-11-26 23:38, BLM768 wrote:

> That was actually one of my first thoughts. It would be pretty, but we'd
> have another dependency then. Also, Ruby doesn't embed well into other
> applications

I has worked fine for me.

> and if we're using another general-purpose programming
> language for our config format, what kind of impression does that give
> others about our confidence in D?

This is (one of the reasons) why people complain. The problem with D is 
that it won't be pretty.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list