Voting for std.experimental.testing

[Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d]

On 09/10/15 1:12 AM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 08:52:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>> Alright seriously?
>> +    /**
>> +     * Generate green coloured output on POSIX systems
>> +     */
>> +    string green(in string msg) @safe pure const
>> +    {
>> +        return escCode(Color.green) ~ msg ~ escCode(Color.cancel);
>> +    }
>>
>> Somebody fix please: https://github.com/robik/consoled
>> Irk I don't like it being done like this. I want it done right or not
>> at all pretty much.
>>
>> Further thought about UDA's especially those with high conflict
>> potential. Perhaps they should instead be moved out into e.g.
>> std.stdudas. That way it is not locked into e.g. testing while being
>> reusable.
>
> What about using compile-time-only struct-wrappers or UDA's for Visual
> attributes such as color, boldness, etc? For a showcase see my pretty.d
> (which I plan to propose to put in std.experimental.pretty):
>
> https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/pretty.d
>
> It has bitrotten a bit lately but I'll fix it today if you want to have
> live showcase.

I don't terribly care about that :) I just hate seeing something that we 
should have being done privately and in Phobos.